On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree <[email protected]> wrote: > What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build > stuff from the relative future?
I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and gcc47 wouldn't produce a working executable at all for a long time (and continue to fail) on my 9.0 and 9.1 systems. There's been so much libreoffice breakage that I don't even bother reporting it or making much effort to fix it. I just reboot to Windows for the cases where I need a working libreoffice. I don't much care whether gcc 4.2 produces a working libreoffice; I just wish something did. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
