On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:40:28AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 12/09/2013 21:49 Konstantin Belousov said the following:
> > Ok, so it is ZFS indeed.  I think I will commit the band-aid to head
> > shortly.
> 
> I am not sure if my message <[email protected]> was intercepted by
> NSA and didn't reach you...  At least I haven't seen any reaction to it.
> So, ZFS does not need this band-aid.  If you think that it may be needed for
> other filesystems or is useful in general, then okay.
> 
> Just in case, r254694 is not in releng/9.2 and I haven't seen any evidence 
> that
> Jimmy has tested a tree that included that commit.
Good to know, thank you.  My change does not conflict with ZFS fix,
and more, the cost of the change for well-behaved filesystem is zero,
since upgrade is only initiated when needed.

I think both fixes can coexist usefully.

Attachment: pgpsDfe1M8d2p.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to