On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 05:58:36PM -0400, Jeff Palmer wrote: > Correct me if I am mistaken, but NO_SENDMAIL means don't compile sendmail. That is true, and it doesn't. You will notice that /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail doesn't get updated when make installworld. What you are seeing in /usr/sbin/sendmail is the mailwrapper, which is called "sendmail" for compatibility. What you should do is put: NO_SENDMAIL=true NO_MAILWRAPPER=true in your /etc/make.conf. Then you won't have your existing sendmail (or other MTA) clobbered. Eric > > As in, I don't want it for one reason or another. > > IMO it doesn't matter where I install it on the machine, if I specifiy I > don't want it, it shouldn't make it. either that, or remove the option > from make.conf. > > > The location of the installed binary, as well as the "man mailwrapper" > are irrelevant. > > > > At 11:32 PM 7/21/00 +0200, you wrote: > >On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, FreeBSD wrote: > > > >| One of the things I did, was uncomment > >| NO_SENDMAIL= true > >| > >| I decided not to enable it because 4.x is still using 8.9.3 however I had > >| installed 8.10.2 > > > >The best is to install your newer sendmail in /usr/local/sbin instead of > >overwriting the original sendmail in /usr/sbin. > > > >| > >| I noticed after my installworld, kernel recompile and reboot, that it > >| did indeed make and install sendmail. > > > >man mailwrapper > > > >| > > > >Regards > >+------ > >Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21 > >Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02 > >Public PGP keys | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
