On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 01:31:14PM +0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hi there colleagues, > > I have stable/10 on a rather big machine (2*8*2 e5 Xeon, 64G RAM, SAS+SSD ZFS > raid10+ZIL+L2ARC) acting as a PostgreSQL server. > > To use such a big resource pool that is mostly idle, I'd deployed poudriere > there (using tmpfs) too. > > Most times this combination works like a charm: LA could be 60+ and no visual > latency increase on SQL queries. > > However, sometimes postgres processes got killed by 'out of swap space'. > I suppose the source of problem could be that VSZ size of postgres processes > (8-9 G) is bigger than swap congigured (4G). > > Is there any way to prevent this, besides reallocating space for swap? > > Quick googling does not help, at least I could not find answers relevant > enough. > > Thanks!
protect(1) ? Best regards, Bapt
pgpmab3b4cR5_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
