Also # uname -a FreeBSD pingpongdb 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # uptime 2:18am up 36 mins, 4 users, load averages: 0,08 0,14 0,10 # ls -lrt /boot/kernel/kernel /boot/kernel/*zfs* -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 21160449 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/kernel -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2320144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19103144 10 Jun 01:36 /boot/kernel/zfs.ko.symbols # strings /boot/kernel/kernel|grep 10.1-RELEASE @(#)FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 10.1-RELEASE-p10
It seems to me the verions numbering is not correct, but the patch *is* there, it should be 10.1-p11, right? > 10 jun 2015 kl. 11:01 skrev Palle Girgensohn <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > It seems the patch level in the UPDATING document is bad in releng/10.1, it > is p29 which is the patch level for 8.4? > > Palle > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > r284193 | delphij | 2015-06-10 00:13:25 +0200 (Ons, 10 Jun 2015) | 8 lines > > Update base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial of > service issues. [EN-15:06] > > Improve reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. > [EN-15:07] > > Approved by: so > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > But the UPDATING says: > > 20150609: p29 FreeBSD-EN-15:06.file > FreeBSD-EN-15:07.zfs > > Updated base system file(1) to 5.22 to address multiple denial > of service issues. [EN-15:06] > > Improved reliability of ZFS when TRIM/UNMAP and/or L2ARC is used. > [EN-15:07] > > 20150513: p10 FreeBSD-EN-15:04.freebsd-update > FreeBSD-EN-15:05.ufs > > Fix bug with freebsd-update(8) that does not ensure the previous > upgrade was completed. [EN-15:04] > > Fix deadlock on reboot with UFS tuned with SU+J. [EN-15:05] > > > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
