Thanks for digging into this! (two laptops are now running -head from today, all iswell. I'll update the t400 tomorrow.)
-a On 28 June 2015 at 16:54, Kevin Oberman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Joseph Mingrone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> writes: >> > ok. I've updated my x230 to the latest -head and it is okay at >> > suspend/resume. >> >> No problem with -head on the X220 as well. >> >> > I can go acquire an x220 (now that they're cheap) to have as another >> > reference laptop. >> >> You might ping Allan Jude. If I'm not mistaken he had at least two >> X220s at BSDCan. Maybe he'd be willing to part with one. > > > I have now merged all of the parts of 284034 except for 281874 and resumes > work fine. As i suspected, something in that rather large commit is the > problem and it is probably something that depends on some other change in > HEAD as Adrian has reported that it works fine in HEAD. > > I'll have to admit that have no idea how to approach figuring this out. I'm > not sure how I can even revert a part of the commit to get 10.2-PRERELEASE > working for me. I really wish that a commit as large as this one had been > MFCed separately. :-( So far there has been only a single commit to pci and > none to pccbb since 284034, so I guess I'll build stable with the files > modified in 281874 manually reverted and see how that goes. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: [email protected] > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > . _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
