I've spent some time on the MFC, the testing would still take some time (likely a day or two) and once that's finished I'll ask re@ for approval. On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:44 PM Tomoaki AOKI <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I already mentioned in another post, head has 4.2.8 p3 in-tree. > > So the answer should be MFC before creation of releng/10.2 is planned > or not. > > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:04:43 +1000 > Peter Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2015-Jul-11 23:22:56 -0400, Chris Nehren < > [email protected]> wrote: > > >On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 09:58:11 +1000, John Marshall wrote: > > >> It's me again with my annual NTP whinge. > > > > > >The answer to the perennial "will release $foo ship with old / insecure > > >/ otherwise deficient $bar?" is still "install $bar from ports". > > > > That's a non-answer. It just changes the question to "why bother to > > include $bar in base when I need to install the port anyway". > > > > -- > > Peter Jeremy > > > -- > Tomoaki AOKI [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
