On 12/16/2015 15:02, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 3:22 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> On 12/16/2015 14:20, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>> I need to do some simple traffic shaping, but whenever I try and use
>>> altq, I dont seem to have any luck-- I mean zero.
>>>
>>> I like the management of pf via pf.conf, but miss the simplicity of
>>> dummynet and ipfw. Has anyone used pf and ipfw together in RELENG10 ?
>>> Any tips / caveats ? Or am I better off re-writing the pf rules into
>>> ipfw and be done with it.
>>>
>>> ---Mike
>> What are you trying to do?
>>
>> I use rate-shaping in ipfw without problems and have been for quite some
>> time.
> Protect some boxes via pf, and then limit one box from eating up all the
> bandwidth when doing a backups and syncs.
> I would like to keep pf for firewall rules, and I would like to use
> ipfw+DUMMYNET for bandwidth shaping
>
>
> ---Mike
>
I use this...
ipfw pipe 1 config bw 3000Kbit/s
ipfw add 1700 pipe 1 tcp from {wherever} to any(and so on.... you can add any sort of flow into the pipe, and it will honor that limit) Works very well. -- Karl Denninger [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> /The Market Ticker/ /[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
