https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207463
--- Comment #2 from Paul J Murphy <p...@inetstat.net> --- Yes, you are correct. My patch was sufficient only for the default usage by /sbin/pfctl, but left scope for other usage to cause problems. I've looked over your patch, and it looks good to me. The existing buffer protection code in pfr_set_addrs() also looks like it will handle a smaller size2 cleanly. I have just updated my releng/10.2 system to stable/10's sys/netpfil/pf and sbin/pfctl, with your patch applied to it, and it seems to both pass a quick and basic functionality test, and fix bug #192677 (it is now successfully replacing a pf table with over 130,000 addrs, where 10.2-p12 fails for anything over around 65,000). Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
