On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:53:20AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:34:24AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:27:40AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:59:33AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > > > > Below is, I believe, the committable fix, of course supposing that > > > > > the patch above worked. If you want to retest it on stable/11, ignore > > > > > efirt.c chunks. > > > > > > > > and remove patch w/ spinlock? > > > Yes. > > > > What you prefer now -- I am test spinlock patch or this patch? > > For success in any case need wait 2-3 days. > > If you already run previous (spinlock) version for 1 day, then finish > with it. I am confident that spinlock version results are indicative for > the refined patch as well. > > If you did not applied the spinlock variant at all, there is no reason to > spend efforts on it, use the patch I sent today.
No, I am did not applied the spinlock variant at all. OK, try this patch. Do you still need first 100 lines from verbose boot? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
