On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:00:34AM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > Some have probably seen this already - > http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2017-March/313254.html > > So, could anyone explain why FreeBSD was owned that much. Test is split > into two parts, one is nginx part, and the other is the IPv4 forwarding
three: UFS part. And multiple simulations access to same file/block can cause page lock congestion. > part. I understand that nginx ownage was due to SO_REUSEPORT feature, > which we do formally have, but in DFBSD and Linux it does provide a > kernel socket multiplexor, which eliminates locking, and ours does not. > I have only found traces of discussion that DFBSD implementation is too > hackish. Well, hackish or not, but it's 4 times faster, as it turns out. > The IPv4 forwarding loss is pure defeat though. > > Please not that although they use HEAD it these tests, they also mention > that this is the GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel which means this isn't related > to the WITNESS stuff. > > Please also don't consider this trolling, I'm a big FreeBSD fan through > the years, so I'm asking because I'm kind of concerned. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
