On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Eric A. Borisch <ebori...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Eric A. Borisch <ebori...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> 4) zpool import -f alpha beta succeeds without any complaints. >> >> IV. Alpha no longer exists, Beta exists (with the same GUID as Alpha) AND >> is active. This is an 'atomic' operation from user's point of view, and at >> no point does zpool list show more than one pool >> >> 5) zpool list shows only beta; scrubs fine, life is good.. >> >> V. Beta exists on disk and is active and healthy. Alpha is no more. >> (Except as a ghost in a cache file) >> > > A quick test revealed one other tidbit this morning; if I 'zpool export > beta' at this point in the process (still in live CD OS), everything is OK > on reboot into the installed OS. > > For whoever wants to investigate handling/hand-off between > bootloader/kernel/fully booted, the problem appears when a: > > 1) root pool is renamed, but not 'zpool export'-ed after rename via an > 'external' OS (live CD) > ** and ** > 2) A stale zpool.cache file exists on the pool referring to the original > name. > bug report created: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219411 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
