Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 22.05.2017 12:51 (localtime):
> Bezüglich Julian Elischer's Nachricht vom 22.05.2017 09:52 (localtime):
>> On 22/5/17 3:04 pm, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote:
>>> Bezüglich Harry Schmalzbauer's Nachricht vom 21.05.2017 20:25
>>> (localtime):
>>>> Mk&bsd.ports.mk still tells:
>>>> # PACKAGES - A top level directory where all packages go
>>>> (rather than
>>>> # going locally to each port).
>>>> # Default: ${PORTSDIR}/packages
>>>>
>>>> Since r438901 (
>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=438901
>>>>
>>>> )
>>> Actually, r438058 broke PACKAGES. For the records, see
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218827
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
>>>
>>>
>> has this been unbroken? We use this feature but are not on the head of
>> the tree yet..
> Nope, not fixed yet and I guess it won't happen, from what I read.
>
> Reverting r438901 and r438058 locally is a suitable solution at the
> moment, but this is going to change soon I fear. The commits seem to be
> required to make ports pkg/poudriere compatible.
My assumption was wrong, it has been "fixed" meanwhile – by emitting
PKGFILE with escaped colons. Great, breaks scripts again here.
No discussion, no apporovals... I whish someone could migrate ports/Mk
into base and freeze it.
"make clean" seems to be fundamentally changed with not yet discovered
side effects. Local scripts don't work as expected anymore. Great! Take
poudriere and unlink -R your own stuff or stay away from ports... I
can't believe how ports evolved during the last years :-(
-harry
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
