On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 5:53 AM Roderick <hru...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > > OK, for putting LUA was invested many many hours, the FORTH was > done in 5 minutes and ist worst quality. >
I'd easily debate this latter bit- the Forth is certainly higher quality. > But the booting and installation problems, that I had to solve in > a tricky way and with additional hardware, began with the LUA loader, > and are solved putting an old loader, as somenone in this thread noted. > Can you share a pointer to the problems you had? It would be highly unusual for swapping out the interpreter to cause problems of this nature. With the way loader is architected, most low-level details don't change with different interpreters, and it's incredibly likely you are looking at a problem that was caused way-independently of swapping out the interpreter. Plenty of things broke between FreeBSD 10/11 and 12 in loader-world as our loader universe got thoroughly rototilled and improved -- many of these things cannot be attributed to lua, but perhaps are because of the coincidental timing. Thanks, Kyle Evans _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
