John Baldwin wrote: > It is kind of semantic. However, on the alpha it is hardly dangerous. Nor > do we fake a MBR on the alpha (which is what makes it dangerous). The alpha > architecture doesn't use MBR's, but the PC arch does. Thus, having a disklabel > on the alpha is normal, having one at the start of a PC disk requires ugly > hacks that break the PC arch, hence the difference. Do I understand you correctly? Are you saying there are potential problems with a "dangerously dedicated" HDD on a PC? I don't use Micros~1 products on any of my machines (acutally, I use nothing but FreeBSD) so I've assumed that there's no reason to do anything other than "dangerously dedicated". Am I wrong is thinking that?? Is this one of those issues where "if it boots, it'll be fine" or is it something that could bite me later?? -Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
