Actually, I meant compile on a -march=pentiumpro system with
/etc/make.conf
set for CPUTYPE=i486 or no cputype.
NOT using the /etc/make.conf with CPUTYPE=p3 to BUILD the 486 code.
This is valid, correct? the tool chain should NOT pick up the host
libraries at all right?
Larry
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 3/12/01, 12:33:02 PM, James Housley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: cputype=486:
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >
> > Not in the log I posted. isatty is NOT that large, so what ever this is,
> > is after isatty in the executable.
> >
> > I wonder if something forgot to pick up the /usr/obj libraries, since the
> > HOST system *IS* compiled with -march=pentiumpro.
> >
> > This is valid, isn't it? (to compile on one box, and install on another
> > with DIFFERENT /etc/make.conf settings)?
> >
> No, because that won't change how it was compiled. Everything is
> compiled for -march=pentiumpro.
> Jim
> --
> /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
> \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
> X - NO Word docs in e-mail .
> / \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TheHousleys.net
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
