> 
> Mike Smith wrote:
> > 
> > > ...
> > > Say introducing a convention like '$!$' to denote an always to be
> > > acceptable change?
> > 
> > No, not acceptable.
> > 
> > In this case, mergemaster should be smart enough to notice that the
> > file in question was unchanged before the merge, and just 
> not irritate
> > you in the first place.
> 
> You've just won my vote! Nonetheless I think a simple pattern
> match like "$!$" could've been implemented long ago - thus 
> saving me uncounted q+i keypresses, whereas introducing 
> smartness into a program might take a tad longer.
> 

        Wasn't there a discussion on something like this ages ago?
I seem to recall somebody suggesting MD5 checksums to see if a file
has changed or not and acting acordingly.

        If you're worried about maintaining a database of checksums,
why not place it in the file itself.  Of course somebody'll mention
recursion: if you grep -v CHECKSUM | md5 and compare with grep CHECKSUM,
you've got something that works and is easy to maintain.

        Just my 2p worth :)


Stewart.

--
Stewart Morgan MEng AMIEEE
Technical Director, Nameless-UK

T: +44 117 974 55 44        | A: The Production House
F: +44 870 168 02 10        |    147a St. Michael's Hill
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  |    Bristol
W: www.nameless-uk.com      |    BS2 8DB



To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

Reply via email to