On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Finally, let's not forget that nobody is FORCING you to run -stable. > In fact, users in your category are always recommended to stick with > the releases and not upgrade until a new one comes out so I'm not > even sure why we're having this conversation in the first place. I'm confused about this. The Handbook says to track -STABLE, if errr... you want stability. Are you saying that in order to have a stable system, we should stick with -RELEASE? Maybe remove the -STABLE branch then? -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Mixtim
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymor... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable an... David McNett
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stabl... Mike Smith
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable an... Russell Jackson
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable a... Juha Saarinen
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stab... Pete Fritchman
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stabl... Jordan Hubbard
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so ... Matt Heckaman
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable an... Mixtim
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Russell Jackson
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? David McNett
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Jeff Love
- Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? W Gerald Hicks
