Juha Saarinen wrote: > > On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Dave Uhring wrote: > > > I use "logging" on Solaris and XFS on Linux and have tried reiserfs on > > Linux. All are superior to UFS/softupdates when the going gets tough. > > Disk access times may or may not be comparable with UFS/softupdates, but > > the integrity of my filesystems is more important than raw speed. > > Hmmm... that's one reason I've not implemented ReiserFS on my Linux box. > Read too many horror stories about how it eats your file system, and how > it doesn't work with NFS etc. Absolutely false. Works perfectly... I have had it on several machines for about a year with absolutely no problems .. nada. On the other hand UFS/softupdates is pretty reliable itself albiet a little pokier. I haven't seen fsck in action for so long I almost forgot it existed. Reiserfs would be nice on FreeBSD though. IBM's JFS might be even better. -- Ted Sikora [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.unixos2.org http://www.powerusersbbs.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
