Go away, go away, go away, go away, go away! You clearly have no
idea what you're talking about, and risk mis-informing people who read the
list in hopes of actually learning something. Congratulations, though, you've
earned a spot in my killfile.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 12:36:06AM -0400, Sung Nae Cho wrote:
> Okay, don't give me crap like I'm troll or anything stupid for I'm FreeBSD
> user. But, I think there is a double standards in BSD community. First
> of all, MAC OS X is not FreeBSD. How can it be a FreeBSD if it has
> totally different core except that it has a FreeBSD user land commands?
> Or, have I heard this wrong? 2nd, I personally don't see the difference
> between APPLE and MICROSOFT. At least Microsoft doesn't pretend to be
> friends with Open Sourced Community. APPLE is bullshit company. It
> builds an OS based on Open Source and they're making it a proprietary.
> That's bullshit! 3rd, OS X is a one crappy OS I've ever seen! Infact,
> most APPLE users have gone back to OS 9 because OS X requires them to buy
> all the softwares (Office suites...etc) built for OS X since the emulation
> is terrible and utterally useless (TOO DAMN SLOW!).
Go away.
> It's also bullshit that FreeBSD community cannot throw away it's pride and
> accept the defeat and try to learn from it. We all heard that in recent
> benchmark, both Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 kick FreeBSD butt in
> performance. FreeBSDers complained so they did the test again with all
> the optimizations enabled and FreeBSD still couldn't beat both Windows
> 2000 and Linux 2.4 (not to mention, Linux 2.4 and Win 2000 didn't even
> receive special treat for getting tuned.) Come one people! Let's cut the
> bull shit and get real. I'm sick of this idiots just saying this and that
> without actually contributing anything to FreeBSD development. I hope
> FreeBSD 5.x does a milestone just like Linux 2.4 and Windows 2000 did.
> Also, don't give me the crap like Windows 2000 and Linux are unstable!
> I've tried em and Windows 2000 is a totally different beast than any
> previous Windows (2000 is stable as a rock!). So is Linux. Linux 2.4 is
> even stabler!
Go away.
> Why then do I use FreeBSD? I use FreeBSD not because it's better than
> Linux or Windows 2000, not because it has better hardware support than
> Linux or Windows, but just because I like the consistent layout of the
> file structures. Redhat seems to move around files on every release.
> Also, ports collections seem to be handy when I'm not in mood to compile
> manually (not that I can't do it in Linux). I wish FreeBSD 5.x finally
> get support for my new Kensington USB (OPTICAL) mouse on my Laptop! I
> don't know about FreeBSD hardware support on desktops, but laptop hardware
> support is simply not impressive! I'm not about to go back to wheel based mouse
> (got tired of cleaning wheels).
>
> I hope this doesn't offend anyone. (Just got tired of listening to crap!)
Go away.
> Sung N. Cho
Go away,
--
Bosko Milekic
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
