On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:44PM +0100, Thomas Gravgaard wrote:
> > I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a
> > cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will
> > run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version
> > won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly
> > reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't
> > have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO.
>
> IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile
>because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only
>run boxes without X11 it would
> conveniently make my life easier too.... But thats another story :)
And to add to that, if I install a new system, the first thing I would
like to do on it, is to run cvsup on both /usr/src and /usr/ports before
I install anything more (include X).
>
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Thomas Gravgaard | "The Scarlet Pimpernel is the most (__) |
> | Software developer | overrated human being since Judas \\\'',) |
> | Infopaq ApS | Iscariot won the AD 31 best disciple \/ \ ^|
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | competition." Black Adder .\._/_)|
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | FC K�benhavn. Danske mestre 2000/2001! |
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
__o
regards, Gunnar ---_ \<,_
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---- (_)/ (_)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
