On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Over the past couple of months, I've been starting to wonder if the
> Quality of FreeBSD's -STABLE branch has been deteriorating, to the point
> that trusting it for any sort of "loaded server" environment is coming
> into question ...
[snip]
> Am I expecting too much from FreeBSD-STABLE? Would I fair better if I
> moved down into RELENG_4_7 and avoided -STABLE altogether?
I think you're expecting too much from -stable. -stable is kind of a
misnomer; read the Handbook section 21.2.2.1 ("What Is FreeBSD-STABLE?")
for more. Your conclusion above is addressed there (spoiler: don't use
-stable in production unless your test environment convinces you that it
will work).
Geoff
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
