On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:05:50AM -0700, Greg White wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:11:22 +0200, Bernhard Valenti > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > is this issue fixed yet? i didnt see any commits to the ipfilter code. > > Not as of Sept. 15th, for sure, and I've not seen any other list > traffic on the subject, either here or on the ipfilter list. I > re-cvsup'd the morning of the 16th with the 15th's code and > buildworld/installworld-ed, hoping that the reason noone had said > anything was that the problem had been fixed. Same oddity with ipf -V > output being version mangled, and same lack of functioning icmp echo. > > -- > Greg White > _______________________________________________ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I have been told that ipfilter has some kind of licence agreement, that requires all code-changes to be aproved by the ipfilter-guy. This is supposed to be the reason why OpenBSD made PF(PacketFilter), insted of implementing ALT-Q and other functionality into IPF. This is probably useless information since the problem, most probably lies in FreeBSD's implementation of IPFilter, and not the IPFilter program it self. None the less, It might be more interesting than spam :P -- ======================================================== | Daniel Bond [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | Mobile: 936 18 243 | | | | Unixcore (www.unixcore.com) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ======================================================== _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
