On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 15:33:48 -0700, secmgr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That would be ASUS who would have embedded the 3COM chip. probably > special order, which is why it didn't report back something recognized. > The ATI chipset is pretty new vs the more tried and known > nVIDIA/SiS/VIA/AMD [South|North]bridges and the Intel hubs > > Running current can be "exciting". Since you seem to have networking > covered, you may want to look at a SATA pci card thats "known" to > freebsd. In theory, the box has two slots. > > jim
The 3com chip is not recognized, since it very new. It is mostly used in laptops. SATA drives attached to the ATI RS300 works fine in 5.3-RELEASE, except that FreeBSD detects the disk as UDMA33, and performance isn't good. PATA disks have better performance on the Pundit-R, even though they are also detected as UDMA33. In fact, I wonder if PATA disks are actually operating at UDMA66 or UDMA100, but FreeBSD doesn't know this, as it it is treating the ATI controller as a generic ATA controller. The reason why I suspect this, is that my PATA disk can do 30MB/s read, and I don't think it is possible to get 30MB/s through a UDMA33 connection, especially with the ATA/IDE overhead. The question I have is, can I trick FreeBSD by adding the device ids for the ATI chipset, at least for IDE? It appears that all of the nVIDIA/SiS/VIA/AMD [South|North]bridges are fairly similar as far as the drivers are concerned. Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"