I have been compiling ports using -O2 since I started using FreeBSD back in 2003 and only port that has had issues with this is lang/ezm3 in FreeBSD 5.2.1 it needed -O.
Chris On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:46:24 +0100, Matthias Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 05:48 PM 17/01/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > Like I said before, switching back to -O makes the system stable once > > again. I let it run continuous buildworlds without issue for 24hrs > > along with burnP6, and memtest running in the background. No problem. > > Then I'd leave it at that. The difference between gcc -O2 and -O is > marginal at best. Think of it as -O being the large axe that chops off > a huge slab, and -O2 being the large axe, followed by some scratching > with a nail-file. Most of the time it isn't worth the effort. > > mkb. > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
