Kris Kennaway wrote:On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:15:52AM +0100, Jos? M. Fandi?o wrote:"Jos? M. Fandi?o" wrote:Chris wrote:Have tested on 3 boxes.
yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
Finally, I found the culprit:
CFLAGS="" \ 100% of the transmited traffic is received COPTFLAGS="" /
CFLAGS= -pipe \ 50% of the transmited traffic is received COPTFLAGS= -pipe /
That would be exceedingly strange, because the above two options are supposed to produce *no differences at all* with the code generation.
I'd believe that -O and no -O could behave differently, although I don't know why you'd want to compile without -O.
because by the time I was compiling the system I was no interested in compiler optimizations. Now I prefer a lightly optimized kernel
than a system with 50% of packet lost in local interfaces ;-)
-O is the default for -STABLE; anything else might very well cause problems. In fact, check out the CFLAGS section of /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf:
"Note that optimization settings other than -O and -O2 are not recommended or supported for compiling the world or the kernel - please revert any nonstandard optimization settings to "-O" before submitting bug reports without patches to the developers."
Jon _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
