On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:45:17 +0200 (EET) "Viktor Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, �������� 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock ����: > > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: > >> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. > >> Beneath is one of them: > >> > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html > >> > >> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? > > > > You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it > > works > > is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here > > since yesterday only). > > Hi there > > I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error > def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble > with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced. > > On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general > system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance. By any chance does it help with copying from ata disks on different controllers ? For me on large files this brings up "swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer" with 4BSD. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
