On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, dima wrote: > > Ah, so they are all on the same bus. Yuck, performance is going to be > > sucky. Bad Tyan, no cookie. That'll also explain the limited number of > > interrupts available. I don't think there's anything we can do to help > > the situation, sadly. > I cannot affect the company equipment purchase policy either :/ > 2 more servers on Tyan motherboards perform pretty bad also.
Well this IS PC hardware we're talkinga bout here. :) If you can show that some other OS is able to confgiure an alternate interrupt then it might just be something up with ACPI. > Well, I dont experience any problems with the base system (the server > has 4G of physical RAM btw). The ports collection isnt amd64-ready > though. I compiled some ports patching their makefiles but some of them > dont compile at all. Say, I failed to build vnc server from ports (I > needed it to install Oracle) the only one I managed to build was an > ancient realvnc (3.3.7), but I couldnt connect to it. I tried to compile > realvnc 4.x from sources but ran into namespace issues (they were > discussed on another thread here regarding some software package; seems > to be a buggy gcc). So, Ive given up and happily installed an i386 > version. Well, thats not a failing of the ports system itself :-) Did you report your problems to the port maintainers? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
