/usr/ports/sysutils/portdowngrade
Never used it. So I can't tell you more.
Ronald.
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:53:43 +0900, Joel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know this is kind of like jumping off the high board before I've checked for water in the pool, but I'm wondering.
Long version of the story --
I need to get an opentsa server running, and their site only has patches for openssl 0.9.7e, not for the latest, 0.9.7f.
The current version in ports is 0.9.7f. I don't know how to massage the ports collection to get a downlevel version yet, and the boss doesn't want me to take time to learn how. (Silly boss.) So I just used the sample stable-supfile to get the system sources and note that the system version has gone up from 0.9.7d to 0.9.7e .
So, I'm thinking to myself this could be heaven or this could be ...
If this works, we are going to be wanting to build a dedicated time stamp server anyway, ...
and similar sirens are calling from far away, ...
but I really don't want to find myself in the situation where I can checkout anytime but never ...
Short version --
What kind of grief am I likely to cause myself if I grab the opentsa patch, apply it to the openssl source in /usr/sys/crypto, and make world?
There's a voice in my other ear that says the patch was not built to mix with freebsd patches to openssl, so I should just grab the stock openssl and build it completely outside the ports tree, configure the timestamp stuff to use the independently built openssl.
-- Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> digitcom, inc. æåäçãããã Kobe, Japan +81-78-672-8800 ** <http://www.ddcom.co.jp> **
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-- Ronald Klop, Amsterdam, The Netherlands _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
