On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:06 +0200, Eirik =?ISO-8859-1?B?2A==?=verby wrote: > [...] The solution, or at least parts of it, would be to have certain parts > of the > jail filesystems mounted in via nullfs (acceptable solution) or unionfs > (ideal solution). However, ever since FreeBSD 4.10 this has been a major > problem, as both filesystems started exhibiting major stability and data > integrity issues. > [...] > What can I expect to see when trying nullfs and/or unionfs today? Has > anything changed?
Don't know if anything has changed, but I'm using nullfs to mount the ports directory of the host into jails. No ill effects. Works great, both under 4.10 and 5.3. (Back when I toyed with unionfs, I found that to be a bit unstable. But nullfs appears pretty solid) Regards, Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
