On Tue, 24 May 2005, Scott Long wrote:
Again, please don't take the abrupt switch to 6.0 to mean that 5.x is flawed or that 6.x will also have a short lifespan. The real purpose of the switch is nothing but positive; it'll keep us focused and prevent us from overreaching and overextending ourselves. It's a very good and very postive strategy.
So why have a 6.X naming convention to begin with? Why not just stay in 5.X name wise? Is there a thread that sheds some light on that topic? Is the goal to have a new major branch every 2 years? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
