# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-28 18:29:59 +0200: > 2005/6/28, Paul Mather <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 11:21 +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-21 16:51:10 +0200: > > > > For accurate measurements and comparisons, you have to make > > > > sure to use _exactly_ the same physical location on the > > > > disk. > > > > > > No you don't. You want to make a side-by-side comparison > > > of two products, and if one of them underperforms, it just > > > underperforms. You cannot use a poor location selection > > > strategy in the driver as an excuse for poor operation. > > > > The point people are making is that location can have a significant > > effect on performance, and so should not be dismissed out of hand. > > Yes, i know that and i agree with them. > that was the reason, why my disk is tiled on first physical Gigabyte for Swap, > and the rest for the system.... > > my target was to compare 2 Versions not 2 Os-Types like FreeBSD and Linux, > but FreeBSD and FreeBSD, in cases RELENG_4 with RELENG_5. > > so that the little difference between the different places for files, > remember i install everytime at the beginning of second Gig on disk, > should be flawlessy and not make the results so big, that the RELENG_4 > has the double of speed from RELENG_5!
I can feel your pain. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991 _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"