David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:44:02PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: >> On Tuesday, 28. June 2005 18:21, Scot Hetzel wrote: >> >> > Are you sure that the problem is with libstdc++ and not the above >> > libraries? >> >> Yes, it's a well known-fact. In fact there might have been a break of ABI >> backwards-compatibility between gcc 3.3 and 3.4, too, but I'm not sure. > > There was. 3.3 could support either the C++ ABI of GCC 3.2, in which > there was an implementation bug; or the fixed ABI of 3.4. I had hoped we > had gone with the fixed ABI rather than being G++ 3.2 compatible, but > that is what users wanted at the time.
Do I read it correctly that on 5.4 (with 3.4 in it) it is possible to convince lang/gcc33 to be binary compatible with system libraries? Do you have any link for it? -- Best regards, Alexander. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
