On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 15:50:33 +0200, Jorn Argelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
JM wrote:
Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 03:12:37PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I've not had a single crash / power outage that background fsck has
been able to deal with. 90% of the time the machine will fail to even
boot to single user mode :(
You should turn write caching off on your drives.
and in addition to that... you can enable a foreground fsck at boot
which might be the better option if boot times aren't an issue.
May I ask how I can do that? Because I've always prefered foreground
fsck then background fsck to be honest. At least you can see what the
machine is doing.
See background_fsck in rc.conf. See also the text below. :-)
ronald.
Jorn
Steve
----- Original Message ----- From: "Niki Denev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I want just to share my last experience with the combination of
power failure + background fsck. After the power returned and the
machine booted, it sheduled background fsck after 60 seconds, but
at this point most of the services were already started, and some of
them seemed to rely on files that were probably in unclean state
before the check.
This unfortunately leaded to some lost email...after the fsck
completed,
everything runs ok, but i have now set background_fsck to NO in
rc.conf.
Here is a sad sample from my qmail log file :
@4000000042c1badc24fc21cc delivery 1: success:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_"libpq.so.3"_not_found,_required_by_"dspam"/did_0+0+1/
@4000000042c1badc24fff25c status: local 2/30 remote 0/20
@4000000042c1badc250151ec delivery 4: success:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_"libpq.so.3"_not_found,_required_by_"dspam"/did_0+0+1/
@4000000042c1badc2502bd34 status: local 1/30 remote 0/20
@4000000042c1badc25050ef4 end msg 23982
@4000000042c1badc2508b0a4 delivery 2: success:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:_Shared_object_"libpq.so.3"_not_found,_required_by_"dspam"/did_0+0+1/
@4000000042c1badc250a9cd4 status: local 0/30 remote 0/20
@4000000042c1badc250c7d4c end msg 24087
@4000000042c1badc2510942c end msg 24040
The filesystem looks the same before, during, and after background
fsck runs, other than the free space information.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--
Ronald Klop
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
