On Thursday 30 June 2005 22:53, Matt Juszczak wrote: > > After changing to PF I did not notice single crash for month > > (production servers with, sometimes, heavy load). > > > > I would try FreeBSD with PF anyway. Works perfectly. > > You say it didn't crash for a month, but then you say to try FreeBSD > with PF because it works perfectly. To me, a month of uptime isn't > perfectly. Can you elaborate? Is your machine still crashing even > though its taking a month instead of a few days like it did > previously?
Could you not use pfsync to mitigate the problem (at least partially)? As for your original question, I think its less work to change your hardware to something you know works than changing operating systems. Why not use single CPU machines for this? > Thanks, > > Matt > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Dominic GoodforBusiness.co.uk I.T. Services for SMEs in the UK. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
