I can't say if this config is safe because I don't have any exper ieince
with it. But, I can say that I use rsync to sync filesystems on
two = boxes. They are ftp servers running openbsd using carp for auto
failo= ver. The backup runs a script to sync a portion of it's
filesyst= em with the master after checking to make sure it's still
the backup. = The sync happens every 5 seconds over a Gbit private
network between the t= wo. The data that is being synced is
normally fairly small. = ; Has been working very well in production
for about 9 or 10 months. = You might want to look into rsync as an
alternative if it is practical for = the data you are wanting to
replicate.
Colin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --= ---
To:= [email protected]
From: Brian Candler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&= gt;
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 09/24/2005 09:21A= M
Subject: geom_mirror and ggatec/d safe for filesystem
replication?
Consider the following scenario:
- Machine 1 has a UFS filesy= stem on a block device.
- It is mirrored to a block device on machine 2,= using
geom_mirror
and ggatec/ggated
- Machine 2 mounts this = filesystem read only.
My question is: is this last step safe?
When an update occurs on machine 1, certain disk blocks will change
"under the nose" of machine 2's mounts. Will all necessary caches be
invalidat= ed?
(e.g. block caches, inode caches) Or could this result in nasty
beha= viour,
up to and including panics?
If so, is there a safer or bet= ter way of performing real-time
filesystem
replication?
Thanks,
Brian Candler.
_________________ ______________________ 5F__= _____
[email protected] mailing list
[1]ht= tp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscrib= e, send any mail to
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
References
1. file://localhost/tmp/3D"ht_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
