On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 02:31:00PM +0100, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 12:18:57AM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > > I was thinking about gvinum for the storage server, but given the > > current documentation and the discussions about it now, I don't want to > > risk it. > > IMHO it's pretty stable in 6.0. I've been running gvinum RAID-5 for a > while now; other than one strange panic (something to do with out of > memory situations, see kern/89660) I haven't had a hitch yet. That > said, I haven't needed to replace a disk yet either (I've demoed this > but it was not yet needed in production use). > > In short, don't write gvinum off just yet. Documentation is around the > corner (as a result of a SoC project). >
Actually gvinum(8) has been committed to CURRENT and RELENG_6 a couple of days ago. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
pgp4XVVYLawMp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
