On Jan 8, 2006, at 3:00 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
This idea has been discussed in the past, and it has a lot of merit. I tend to have a fundamental opposition to adding new pseudo- targets unless they are ABSOLUTELY necessary, since they add complexity to the system and reduce flexibility with ordering. However, this may actually be a case where it's both useful and worth the cost.
It would certainly get rid of the need for naming the startup scripts like 000.foo.sh to force it to happen.
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
