On Sat, 4 Feb 2006, Wilko Bulte wrote: [snip]
WB> > My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox WB> > breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox WB> > person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags. WB> WB> I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as WB> what normal release builds use. Nothing more, nothing less. Well, why not take the portbuild approach then? Build standard tinderboxen with standard source and compile flags set, and *also* experimental sets with experimental flags and possibly experimental source patches... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
