Oliver Fromme wrote: > martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > martinko wrote: > > > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > > To enable user mounts, there are three conditions: > > > > > 1. sysctl vfs.usermount=1 > > > > > 2. The user must have read+write permission on the device > > > > > which is to be mounted. This is usually accomplished > > > > > by creating a special group for this device. > > > > > 3. The user must _own_ the mountpoint (r/w permission is > > > > > not sufficient). > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > $ ll /dev/ad0 > > > > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 96 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0 > > > > > > Condition #2 isn't met: The device must be "rw" for for > > > the user (in this case for the operator group). Note > > > that "r" is not sufficient, even for read-only mounts. > > > > sure. but why did it mount /usr/home/mato/mnt/dos then ?? > > Maybe /dev/ad0s1 had different permissions? >
$ ls -la /dev/ad0* crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 96 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 97 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 98 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s2 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 99 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s3 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 101 Feb 8 19:27 /dev/ad0s3a crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 102 Feb 8 19:27 /dev/ad0s3b crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 103 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s3c crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 104 Feb 8 19:27 /dev/ad0s3d crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 105 Feb 8 19:27 /dev/ad0s3e crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 106 Feb 8 19:27 /dev/ad0s3f crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 100 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s4 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 107 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s5 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 108 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s6 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 109 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s7 crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 110 Feb 8 18:27 /dev/ad0s8 _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
