On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 04:40:46AM +0000, Chris wrote: > On 07/02/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:17:45PM -0800, Jon Holstrom wrote: > > > i cvsuped for 5.4 stable a few days ago. > > > server gave me 5.5 prerelease > > > > Right, because they're the same. > > > > > works good, > > > > > > gnome2-2.12 ( had to pkg_deinstall -r deinstall gnome 2.10) > > > Xorg 6.9.0 > > > > > > just slow as can be > > > > This is unlikely since changing the name of the release doesn't > > magically make it slower, but if you really think so, then again, > > please explain. > > > > Kris > > > > > > > Saying 6 is preferable in every way is a sweeping statement, their are
Note that I didn't say that. > numerous reasons why people may not want to jump to 6.0 just yet, I for > instance have found some issues in 6.0 which stop it working so well with my > hardware possibly due to the i386 code removal I dont know but that is what > might be it, and I use some software which isnt yet to be compatible with > 6.x. Hopefully all my problems will be resolved when 6.1 is released. Your issues probably won't be fixed if you don't report them, though. Kris
pgpx0wLRQ3Eu0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
