Hi, >>>>> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:46:30 +0200 >>>>> Rostislav Krasny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rosti.bsd> As far as I understand the code of selecthost() it walks through linked rosti.bsd> lists of known virtual hosts and their addresses and compares the rosti.bsd> addresses to a local address of connected socket. This way it tries to rosti.bsd> find - configuration of what virtual host should be used. There is an rosti.bsd> additional comparison that seems like a workaround for misconfigured rosti.bsd> virtual host that can be resolved only to IPv4 address and should be rosti.bsd> used on IPv4-mapped IPv6 address. If virtual hosts are properly rosti.bsd> configured that hack is not needed, IMHO. If you nuke this workaround from both selecthost() and my patch, you need to specify a native IPv4 address and/or an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address into ftphosts appropriately. It will confuse users. So, it is requierd. rosti.bsd> Anyway selecthost() is called with local socket name and it checks a rosti.bsd> local address, while his_addr.su_sin6.sin6_addr is a remote address. rosti.bsd> Local and remote hosts have same address families but not same rosti.bsd> addresses. The his_addr is referred to determine just an address family, here. When a remote address is an IPv4-mapped IPv6 address, a local address is as well. So, it should be okay. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED],jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
