Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 3/16/06, J. Buck Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You know, I tried printing it out, but I still can't see the naked lady...

:-)

Beware, by answering spam messages like
that you get your address into spam filters all
over the world. Change the subject line next
time.

You might notice my email address - it's only used on this listserv, and is a disposable alias. I start getting too much spam on it, I unsubscribe, resubscribe with a variant (say, freebsd1), and kill the old alias. I can't recommend this enough to anyone running their own MX server - I never give out the same email address to two different organizations. That way I know who's violating their own privacy policies when I start getting spam.

To give you a for-instance - at work, where I have only one address, and it's given out to all of our vendors, I get about 300 spam per day (that's AFTER the RBLs). At home, on my own domain, I have about 130 different aliases pointing to one account, and get about 3 spam mails a day, but to only two aliases - the one in my domain registration (which is whois accessible), and this one (because it's web-archive spiderable).Any other spam I get (which is rare), I check the privacy policies of the sender (usually legitimate bulk-mail services) and their client (Target being the biggest offender) and rat the former out to the latter as violating published terms of service, and cc: it to the FTC.

Oh - wait - sorry, I misread. You meant that people might not get messages FROM that address anymore. Meh. I don't consider myself that important; if people don't get my random musings, they won't miss them.

Happy Thursday!
--
I never could get the hang of Thursdays.

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to