On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 08:25:35AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Casey Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 0:27:30 AM GMT-0800 > Subject: Re: 6.1 PRERELEASE kernel build error > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 10:27:56AM -0800, Casey Scott wrote: > > I just upgraded 5.4 stable to 6.1 PRERELEASE via buildworld. I am trying to > > build a kernel, and keep getting this error at "make". > > > > > > ...... > > cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=pentium4 -Wall > > -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual > > -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. > > -I../../../contrib/altq -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/pf > > -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd > > -I../../../contrib/ngatm -I../../../dev/twa -D_KERNEL > > -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common > > -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param > > large-function-growth=1000 -mno-align-long-strings > > -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 > > -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1172: warning: redundant redeclaration of > > 'devfs_ops_f' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:70: warning: previous declaration of > > 'devfs_ops_f' was here > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1183: warning: redundant redeclaration of > > 'devfs_vnodeops' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:68: warning: previous declaration of > > 'devfs_vnodeops' was here > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:1205: warning: redundant redeclaration of > > 'devfs_specops' > > ../../../fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:69: warning: previous declaration of > > 'devfs_specops' was here > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > I even get that error building a kernel from the GENERIC config. I think > > something is wonky with gcc. >Has anyone else seen this, or know what could > > be causing it? > > > >You didn't follow the correct upgrade order - it's documented in the > >handbook and in /usr/src/UPDATING. > > > >Kris >
> Thanks for that info. I have the kernel built now. I noticed that it > is built from the source in /usr/obj and not /usr/src. No, /usr/obj contains the results of your buildworld, it's not a second copy of the source. > In 6.x, do we > have to keep /usr/obj after installworld, or should installworld > have updated /usr/src ? You do not have to keep /usr/obj. Kris P.S. Please wrap your lines so that your emails may be easily read.
pgpP9slLKBnjI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
