Robert Watson wrote:


On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Marc G. Fournier wrote:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/48471

[kernel] [patch] new feature: private IPC for every jail

Its an ancient, 4.x patch for having private IPC in a jail ... not sure how hard it would be to bring it up to 6.x / -current standards though ... but it seems like something 'good' that is needed ...


In the past I've looked at doing things along these lines, but usually stall after a first hack when trying to decide how to deal with two critical issues:

(1) The fact that system v ipc primitives are loadable, and unloadable, which
    requires some careful handling relating to registration order, etc.


this is related to the problem that needs to be solved for getting vimage into -current.


(2) The name space model for system v ipc is flat, so while it's desirable to allow the administrator in the host environment to monitor and control
    resource use in the jail (for example, delete allocated but unused
segments), doing that requires developing an administrative model for it.


it is possible the admin environment can't see it.
unless you prefix it with something..


These challenges can be surmounted, but the doing them in a nice way requires some thought.

Robert N M Watson
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to