Hi, I broke the amr_cam interface several months ago when I locked the driver. I've been neglecting it ever since due to lack of time, and due to the amr_cam interface not being terribly useful. If you do in fact have a use for it, let me know and I'll add it to my TODO list.
Scott Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Thanks, that fixed it! : ) scottl: Could you commit (and MFC) the fix? It's as simple as adding a MODULE_DEPEND line: MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1); after the DRIVER_MODULE line in src/sys/dev/amr/amr_pci.c I'm not sure about amr_linux though; it seems that there's no CAM reference in amr_linux.c, but that amr_linux is just a compatibility layer on top of amr. In that light, perhaps: MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, amr, 1, 1, 1); is in order. Also, the existing MODULE_DEPEND line probably should be changed to: MODULE_DEPEND(amr_linux, linux, 1, 1, 1); Cheers, Eugene John-Mark Gurney wrote:Eugene M. Kim wrote this message on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 19:55 -0700:I'm trying to upgrade from 5-stable to 6-stable; after rebooting to the new kernel, the amr(4) module (amr.ko) refuses to load with this message: link_elf: symbol cam_simq_alloc undefined However, a quick nm(1) on /boot/kernel/cam.ko does show: ... 0000f0ac T cam_sim_set_path 0000efc4 T cam_simq_alloc 0000efd4 T cam_simq_free ... and cam.ko is already loaded before amr.ko. What am I missing here? *scratches head 'o 'a*amr is missing a: MODULE_DEPEND(amr, cam, 1, 1, 1); which means the module doesn't get cam's symbols... might as well add that line to amr_linux.c next to MODULE_DEPEND already there...
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
