On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 08:05:12PM -0700, David Kirchner wrote: > On 5/3/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:21:39PM -0700, David Kirchner wrote: > >> However, one could argue that as quotas worked OK in releases prior to > >> 6.0 (and perhaps earlier), that there is a longer-term regression. > > > >There was a quota regression in 6.0. It was fixed 2 months ago. > >AFAIK snapshots and quotas are also broken in 5.x, so the remaining > >problem is not a regression. > > It depends on the statement's scope. I was suggesting that there is a > regression in the overall scope of the "user experience" between a 4.x > and a 5.x or 6.x system, when using the default and recommended > options.
Having tested this extensively, I disagree. Kris
pgpqzPy2VHJSL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
