Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 02:27 PM 05/05/2006, Mike Jakubik wrote:
This quota/nve problem sure stirred things up, i guess im partly to
blame, but anyway i think that it all boils down to is this; FreeBSD
users now demand stability and performance, as opposed to an influx
of new bells and
I think you *are* forgetting it is a volunteer project, so demand is
not a word that can really come into play. No one here has made any
No i am not, i made that clear, please read the whole message again.
commitment to you or any other user about what will and will not be in
FreeBSD. If FreeBSD meets your needs, thats great! If not, perhaps try
help fixing it yourself, or contributing funds to have someone fix
it. I have been using FreeBSD for some time and run a LOT of my
business on top of it. So when things dont work, its a drag. Deal
with it as best you can (e.g. fix it yourself, work around it or
Just because it's a volunteer project, doesn't mean the community has no
right to express their ideas and concerns. If everyone were to sit
quietly the state of this and even the existence of other BSDs would not
be the same as now.
choose a new OS or pay someone to fix it). In the case of quotas, dont
use snapshots. In the case of the NVE, a $5 realtek (rl) will work
just fine.
It's not always that simple.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
