Chris H. wrote:
Quoting Iantcho Vassilev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
My vote goes to PureFtpd..
It`s ideal server..
But is not *nearly* as secure as vsftpd.
Hi,
I'm curious - do you have any empirical evidence to support this?
A trawl of a few vulnerabilty databases would suggest your comment is
not entirely accurate.
NVD NIST [1] shows 4 entries for vsftpd (latest 2005-12) , 1 for
pureftpd (latest 2004-08)
SecurityFocus [2] shows 1 entry for vsftpd (latest 2004-05), 2 for
pureftpd (latest 2004-07)
ISS X-Force [3] shows entries 3 for vsftpd (latest 2004-05), for 1
pureftpd (latest 2004-07)
Regards,
Jase.
[1] http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm
[2] http://www.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities
[3] http://xforce.iss.net/xforce/search.php
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
