On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 23:44 -0600, Scott Long wrote: > ports tree in the process, the end result is a bit more undefined. One > thing that I wish for is that the ports tree would branch for releases, > and that those branches would get security updates. I know that this > would involve an exponentially larger amount of effort from the ports > team, and I don't fault them for not doing it. Still, it would be nice > to have.
Yes, totally agree. That's the way OpenBSD ports tree works and it worked very well for me. Thus not to say FreeBSD's one didn't, but it takes a lot more attention, which isn't always a bad thing ;) -- Massimo.run(); _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
